The Photographer’s Eye: Composition and Design for Better Digital Photos

5 Comments

1. 

   T. Campbell / September 20, 2010

   Review by T. Campbell for The Photographer’s Eye: Composition and Design for Better Digital Photos
   Rating:
   This is the best single volume on visual design and composition in years. Painters need a book this good. Freeman’s earlier book from the 1980s, “Image,” had long held the status, IMHO, of being the best single volume. His new book surpasses the older one by a significant margin.

   Freeman is one of very few photographers, or artists of any ilk, who can articulate their art-related thoughts in concrete, accurate, analytical ways, and not in the jargon of so much of what is written about art that lacks any actual content. Not only is he an outstandingly gifted photographer, with dozens of books to his credit, but one who has mastered the grammar of images and is one of the few who can describe how and why visual phenomena work.

   This is the most complete volume on this subject out there in terms of numbers of topics introduced and discussed at a reasonable length. It is also the most effective melding of the insights of current Gestalt perception theory with traditional design elements/principles in print. The first 60% of the book deals with the more concrete aspects of designing an image.

   The last two chapters marry the other part of composing that is harder to articulate well: the message in a image, or the photographer’s intent. Only in this book has an author attempted to define major categories of intent in making an image. And then categorizes the physical and mental aspects of how a photographer goes after, constructs, or recognizes an image – the process.

   Throughout the discussions he introduces those aspects of digital imaging that a photographer can use to influence a picture’s design. Perhaps the most powerful development is that digital in-camera and post processing technologies allow the photographer to apply to color images all those image control aspects formerly available only in the wet chemistry darkroom to monochrome images, as well as many more.

   Make no mistake…. This is a book for readers. One cannot get all of this book’s benefit from the illustrations alone, in the manner of so many “how-to” art and photography books these days that have pictures, but little text. But this is the book to which thoughtful photographers will return over and over for many years.

   The only way it can be significantly better would be to have twice as many pages. It would make a wonderful textbook for any studio art, photography, art history, or art appreciation course in high school or college/university.

   5 May 2009, update. The number of reviews, number of responses to reviews, and other sources of information indicate that this book is a certifiable best-seller among photography books. The response to this book indicates that there is a large market for information about the structure of images and for effective writing on that difficult, intangible interplay between design and content, or of structure and expression/message.

   My hope is that Freeman and other capable author/photographers will publish books delving further into the composition problem. To date, the in-print situation is grim. This one, Mante’s, and Hoffmann’s books are about the only ones yet in English that deal with composing photographs at higher than the most elementary levels. Together these three books comprise quite a strong presentation at the intermediate level of image structure and of various approaches to imparting meaning and expression in one’s images.

   There is more, though, that can be said. To date there is no thorough look at the role of similarity and proportion in causing a viewer’s eye to move through an image. That is to say, which characteristics among, shape, size, tone, color, direction, etc., assume priority in one’s eye in which combinations, and how does proportionality, or violations thereof, work?

   To date, this reviewer cannot find any published research that updates Alfred Yarbis’s ground breaking insights into eye movement in images from the 1950s and 1960s. His work is quoted to this day as the definitive study in this field. His results seem to imply that many artists’ assertions about the role of “leading lines” may be nothing but bunk.

   Do light tones and bright colors really appear to project toward a viewer and darks recede? A Russian scientist has a considerable argument that, in fact, darks are what appears to “project” and lights recede. His work is not available in English.

   Is the success or failure of an image still articulable only at the level of intangibles? At this point in the history of the arts and contributions from visual psychology and brain studies, one should be able to make specific assertions about structure and its role in the success or failure of carrying the artist’s expression or meaning.

   Unfortunately, there are very few artists or photographers who also write who can focus clearly enough on these nitty-gritty issues to make statements that have actual meaning. An inordinate percentage of writing about the arts still reduces to hand waving and ranting: always has, always will, it seems.

   It is one of Freeman’s gifts that he can write analytically and be a very successful, versatile artist. This book’s success indicates that the demand is there for hard-hitting information on images. Three authors does not amount to much of a supply.

   Reply
2. 

   Jeff Wignall / September 20, 2010

   Review by Jeff Wignall for The Photographer’s Eye: Composition and Design for Better Digital Photos
   Rating:
   Let me start by saying that even though I write photo books for a living (including The Joy of Digital Photography (Lark Photography Book) and Exposure Photo Workshop: Develop Your Digital Photography Talent, I don’t know Michael Freeman and have never communicated with him. That said, this is easily the best composition and design book that you’ll find–and that goes for professionals as well as hobbyists. This is the first book, in fact, that I can recall that covers these topics with such depth and clarity of thought.

   Freeman has long been one of my favorite photo book writers and this book continues his long streak of great reads (his other recent book, The Complete Guide to Digital Photography is also worth owning).I sometimes laugh at how extremely British his writing is, but it’s just amusing, not distracting.

   The main thing that I like about The Photographer’s Eye is that Freeman approaches the subject from a very thoughtful perspective. While the book covers the basic elements (lines, shapes, dynamic tension, balance, etc.) he also talks at length about more emotionally-related issues: chiaroscuro and key, the search for order, reactive thought, etc. These are the concepts that more experienced photographers (and artists) find themselves confronting once they have a solid feel for design elements and construction.

   I often find myself wondering if design is more of a thoughtful process or an instinctive one–and I think it’s a combination of the two. In reading this book, in fact, I can see better the value in taking an objective and analytical look a how great compositions are made and how we can take scenes that we react to instinctively and find quick and useful ways to turn them into dynamic photos. Very often when you find a great subject you don’t have the luxury of time to decide how to construct the image to “get” what you see.

   That is the value of studying composition and image design: to prepare you to make fast decisions. If you are hiking in the deserts outside of Tucson, for example, and you come across a great potential silhouette of a saguaro cactus at sunset, you have only two or three minutes to organize the elments, choose the best viewpoint, the best lens and then make the exposure. It’s tragic to spend day after day exploring for powerful images and then only come close.

   Freeman’s book is crammed with an extraordinary number of great photos with a vast emotional and geographic diversity. These are world-class images, not just “how-to” examples and it’s hard to imagine one photographer coming up with all of these great photos. As I said, I write and illustrate photo books myself and I am awed at times by Freeman’s proflific work.

   If you’re looking for a book on design, don’t let $20 stand between you and all of this great knowledge and hundreds of fine examples (something I might say of my own book, as well!). Just buy the book–or ask you library to order it.

   Reply
3. 

   GJ / September 20, 2010

   Review by GJ for The Photographer’s Eye: Composition and Design for Better Digital Photos
   Rating:
   Freeman’s journey through the the principles of photographic composition is eye-opening, eloquent, and beautifully published.

   This is not a book on the basics of taking “better photos,” so those who seek information on exposure, cameras, lenses will not find it here. Nor is such shooting information for any photographs included. In a general book on photography, this would be a major defect, but here such information would only distract from the book’s primary subject: the composition of a visual image.

   On the surface, photographic composition may seem to be a very subjective and idiosyncratic topic: you may like one thing, I may like something else. And if it’s all subjective, merely a matter of personal preferences, tastes, and opinions, why bother writing a book about it? Most books on photography thread gently on this shaky, insecure ground, and their authors usually limit themselves to a few simple, predictable pointers: the rule of thirds, and golden section, with a particular emphasis on golden rectangle.

   But Freeman quite clearly believes that, although ultimately each photographer makes their own choice about what composition works best for their photograph, good choices are those that are deliberate (not accidental), and informed by being aware of ALL the possibilities that are available. The Photographer’s Eye will give any intermediate or advanced photographer a better awareness and grasp of choices that are to be made.

   Freeman starts at the edge of the image (chapters about the frame) and moves inwards. Available formats, for example (4:3, 3:2, square, horizontal vs. vertical, etc.) are all carefully explored through numerous, and well-chosen examples. Unlike many books that show different images as examples of different formats, Freeman often selects one, single image and shows how its perception will change, depending on the selected format or compositional principle at play. In the chapters on framing I enjoyed particularly the sections focused on “going against the grain” or against the “natural direction” of an image, i.e., shooting typically “vertical” topics (e.g., a standing man) as horizontal frame, or the other way round (e.g., a sleeping man on a bench shot in a vertical format Freeman uses).

   Gradually, the author moves inwards, discussing the content of photographs in the context of forms (curves, lines, etc.) and compositional principles (e.g., symmetry, or a very complete discussion and listing of types of contrast). The closing chapters go totally “outside” of the single image, considering the impact of external framing and space around the photograph (e.g., matting), as well as multi-image compositions (such as book or magazine spreads).

   As some readers have correctly pointed out, some of the information has been published before in the author’s own previous books, and in other sources; but here, all the observations have been systematically, and very elegantly brought together, in one comprehensive and complete volume.

   This book doesn’t read easily, or fast. It forces the readers to engage both sides of their brain, since paying close attention to the images is as important here as carefully reading the words. But it is well worth the effort, and the reward, in addition to access to the authors’ extensive knowledge, is a new, different way of seeing things which in themselves are not new. For me, this is the function, and definition, of a master-class, and this book certainly deserves to be called that.

   Reply
4. 

   Ivan / September 20, 2010

   Review by Ivan for The Photographer’s Eye: Composition and Design for Better Digital Photos
   Rating:
   This is a good book for someone looking for a guide to composition theory in photography. It covers a lot of ground and actually teaches you compositional principles, however it’s also really hampered by the mediocre writing style. The language just isn’t very concise/clear, and at times you are wishing the author would get to the point instead of writing 10 convoluted sentences, which essentially say one thing. Unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be anything else close to this book available, so if you want to learn composition and design, this is probably your best bet at the moment despite the writing style.

   Reply
5. 

   Patrick Holt / September 20, 2010

   Review by Patrick Holt for The Photographer’s Eye: Composition and Design for Better Digital Photos
   Rating:
   Ok anytime you talk aboutPhotographic composition and rules for it, you get into a grey area since art is subjective by nature. What the author does here is show his photos and explain what composition techniques he used and why he thinks they work. The book is very comprehensive and offers numerous example. The print quality is excellent as it is in most Focal press book. If you want a book that explains photographic compositional theory and offers great examples to demonstrate the concepts, then this is the book you need.

   Reply